“Good governance is perhaps the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting development” said Kofi Annan, 1998.
The Approach Paper to the Twelfth Plan emphasizes the need to redouble our efforts to ensure that a 4% average annual agricultural growth rate is achieved, if not more. In this context Government’s commitment to good governance in agriculture can significantly contribute to achieving a 4% average annual growth.
This is because the concern of good governance has its genesis in the sustainability of Big Ag projects that are funded by the Government through budgetary resources and/or financed by the Rural Financial Institutions through mobilizing resources from customers and the market to achieve specific objectives along with measurable development indicators. This paper briefly highlights the definition, concepts and characteristic features of good governance and in the light of farmers’ voice the need for examination and reinventing the governance system for agricultural policies, programs and projects to yield expected results.
The World Bank in 1992 in the light of the report “Government and Development” defined governance as “the manner in which power is exercised in the management of a country’s economic and social resources for development”.
Governance has political, economic, and administrative dimensions. Political governance is the process of decision-making to formulate agricultural growth policy whereas economic governance emphasizes decision-making processes that affect country’s all economic activities and their relationships with the agricultural economy. Administrative governance deals with the implementation policy. The inmost developing countries the Government in consultation with farmers’ organizations, NGOs, civil society, development economists and the private sector considers necessary to put in place the legal, economic and social systems and institutions of governance to guarantee livelihoods and food security to teeming millions and progressively alleviate rural poverty in particular and environmental protection and women’s advancement in general.
Governance comprises the following three distinct identified concepts:
- The process by which the authority is judiciously exercised in the implementation and management of agricultural projects in the country utilizing economic and social resources for development.
- The capacity of officials to design, formulate and implement policies and programs and discharge functions to yield expected outcomes.
- Farming communities’ability to demand better public services and hold public officials including politicians, legislators and administrators accountable.
For sustainable agricultural development, the existence of a predictable and transparent framework of rules and institutions is a sine qua non to implement the conceptualized projects. Good governance, therefore, emphasizes establishing effective mechanisms, processes and institutions through which farmers articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights, meet their obligations and mediate their differences.
Good governance can broadly be assessed in the following terms.
- Voice and accountability: to eliminate the abuse of public office for private gains and diversion of resources.
- The rule of law: access to justice and enforcement of rights to land, water, food, etc.
- Regulatory quality: quality of agricultural development policies and regulations.
- Government effectiveness: efficiency and equity in the provision of agricultural services and infrastructure.
With the World Bank’s initiative two decades ago to define governance others international institutions including the United Nations Development Program, International Development Association, Asian Development Bank, and African Development Bank have contributed quite significantly to the understanding of the issues on governance on policies and programs involving investments in sectors of economic growth including agriculture. The following are essential characteristic features of good governance, among others, that can profitably be applied to agriculture.
- Legal and judicial reforms: A pro-development and pro-governance legal and judicial system should be in place in which the laws are unambiguous, clear and are uniformly applied by an independent judiciary. Legal frameworks should be fair and enforced impartially, particularly in case of abuse of office and financial powers.
- The rule of law: A fair, predictable and stable legal framework is essential so that entrepreneurs may assess economic opportunities and act on them without fear of arbitrary interference or expropriation. This requires that rules be known in advance that they would be actually in force and applied consistently and fairly, that conflicts be resolvable by an independent judicial system, and that procedures for amending and repealing the rules exist and are publicly known.
- Predictability: Laws and policies should exist that regulate society and that are applied fairly and consistently. Predictability requires the State and its subsidiary agencies to be bound by and answerable to the legal system in the same way as private enterprises and individuals. The specific area of action could be the development of predictable legal frameworks for private-sector enterprises.
- Effectiveness and efficiency: Institutions and processes should produce results that meet needs while making the best use of resources.
- Public-sector-management: Public sector management requires a change in its organizational structure to understand and fulfill people’s aspirations, using resources efficiently, sharpening administrator’s concern and commitment towards poor farmers and placing public-enterprise managers continuously underperformance reviews and evaluation of economic outcomes.
- Participation: Good governance requires that farmers and their interest groups have the opportunity to participate during the formulation of development strategies and that directly affected communities and groups should be able to participate in the design and implementation of programs and projects. This aspect of governance is an essential element in securing commitment and support for the smooth and qualitative implementation of agricultural projects. The policy and programs should be flexible enough to offer beneficiaries and others affected the opportunity to improve their design and implementation as and when need be. The specific areas of action would be in the development of participatory and consultative processes. Stakeholders should exercise influence over policy decisions and share control of resources and institutions that affect their lives, thereby applying check and balance on the power of Government. All categories of farmers including women should have a voice in decision-making, either directly or through legitimate intermediate institutions that represent their interests. Such broad participation and consultation is built on freedom of association and speech, as well as on the capacity to participate constructively.
- Transparency and information: Transparency and information are critical components of good governance and to reinforce accountability. The public as users should have access to transparent information on policy-decisions and programs of investment and to ensure efficient resource use, minimize waste, avoid diversion and unproductive use. The public should have easy and reliable access to institutions, processes and information through various authentic sources and there should be clarity as to rules and regulations.
- Accountability: Implementing agencies and their employees should be held accountable for their actions to the entities from which they derive their authority. Elected individuals and organizations charged with a public mandate should be held accountable for specific actions to the public from which they derive their authority. In a narrow sense, accountability focuses on the ability to account for the allocation, use and control of public assets in accordance with legally accepted standards. In a broader sense, it is also concerned with the establishment and enforcement of rules of corporate governance. Decision-makers in government, the private sector and civil society organizations should be accountable to the public as well as to institutional stakeholders.
- Abuse of office: Congenial environment must be created to help fight the abuse of public office for private gain.
Governance reforms and strategies
- Governance reforms require changes in institutional structures and legal system, viz. [a]Decentralization of the provision of agricultural services [research, education, extension, input supply, processing, marketing, etc.], functions/responsibilities [staff] and funds [resources]to lower levels of Government [district, Block and villages] and [b]institutional reforms of ministries and departments of agriculture [creation of autonomous agencies, seeking the involvement of private sector, development institutions and NGOs and transfer of management functions to local groups]. In the current context, the emphasis has to be to significantly strengthen Panchayati Raj institutions [at district, Block and village levels] financially and equip with professional managerial staff to be capable of planning and implementing agricultural development projects.
- Governance reforms to improve existing legal and institutional framework by [a]promoting effective participation of farmers [ more importantly groups of small, marginal, women and tenant farmers, sharecroppers and oral lessees] and their organizations, [e.g. Consortium of Indian Farmers Association]in agricultural policy processes [b]refining management information system in the department of agriculture at local levels [c] initiating community-driven agricultural development projects and [d] supporting Self-Help-Groups of small producer-organizations.In the present context, efforts have to be to create awareness among farmers and seek their full participation, train them and build their capacity.
- Strategies that can lead to governance outcomes are acknowledged as “demand-side” and “supply-side” strategies.[a] The “demand-side” strategy aims at strengthening the ability of the farmers and their organizations to demand better public services on-time and hold public officials accountable, including elected representatives, legislators and administrators. This strategy refers to the “voice and accountability” dimension of good governance [b]The“supply-side” strategy aims at strengthening the capacity of the administrators and other service providers to supply services effectively and efficiently and to be more responsive to farmer’s priorities and needs. This strategy refers to the “Government effectiveness” dimension of good governance.
The decentralization process, as a part of good governance for agriculture, holds promise to provide better services by “bringing Government closer to farmers”.
Important features of decentralization include:[i] Transfer of professional staff, administrative functions and financial resources to lower levels of Government at district, Block and villages [ii] Political decentralization accompanied by fiscal and administrative decentralization has considerable potential making service providers accountable to farmers and locally elected Governments. [iii] Active participation and committed consultation with farmers and their interest groups enable Government to develop workable and sound agricultural policies and regulations. [iv] Promoting local level farmers’ organizations[e.g. Consortium of Indian Farmers’ Association]at the district level and strengthening farmer’s rights to information can make decentralization effective.
India has over a period of time evolved and put in place a decentralized governance system for agricultural development in specific areas that, inter alia, include agricultural research, education and training, extension services, input supply system, processing, storage and warehousing, agricultural marketing. This has yielded encouraging results in increasing farm productivity, output and reducing rural poverty. Now is an opportune time to build on these successes and draw a road map of good governance, inter alia, concentrating further on decentralization, thereby strengthening organizationally, financially and functionally lower level Governments particularly at Block and village level and demonstrating a commitment to partner and consult farmers and farmers’ organizations to know from them what they really want in respect of research, new agricultural development strategy, accessing financial resources, among others.
Farmers and their organizations want their voice heard as is evident from the following:
- Innovative farmers: It has been well documented that there are several innovative farmers. They have keen observation power and better insight about agriculture-related problems. They use traditional knowledge judiciously to fight area-specific problems in agriculture. Their creative potentials have to be acknowledged. Their active participation and consultation can help develop appropriate location-specific technologies. Experience suggests that formal researches often do not address the problems of high-risk areas and, therefore, farmers themselves develop on their own crop varieties and cultivation practices for their survival. Recognizing that “Necessity is the mother of invention” farmers have developed manually operated water lifting devices and pumps to lift water from small streams to higher elevations. Farmers in high-risk areas are more innovative than other farmers to find a solution for their survival. Among innovations, noteworthy are plant varieties, cultivation practices, processing, agricultural tools, non-chemical pest management, harvesting, storing, preservations, mechanical technologies, soil and water management, etc. The participatory approach is the appropriate tool for understanding problems and technological gaps in high-risk areas. Endeavors should be to develop technology by encouraging innovative farmers. It is a participatory approach and necessitates the involvement of all stakeholders, viz. research institutes, financial institutions, innovating farmers, NGOs, women SHGs, to promote local innovations in a scientific and sustainable way. Active participation of innovative farmers and their organizations in each country’s agro-ecological regions in decision-making policy can significantly help farmer-friendly designing agricultural researches in areas, inter alia, viz. [i] development of high-yielding varieties of crops [ii] agronomic practices involving the use of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, water in different combinations to evolve yield-maximizing and cost-minimizing technologies [iii] use of farm tools, equipment and machinery [iv]post-harvest management [v] agricultural advisory services for efficient management of land, water and energy resources, agricultural marketing etc.
- There have been over 100agricultural development schemes framed by the Central Government and are being implemented by State Governments in which farmers in a large number of districts out of 630 need significant changes to suit their areas depending on soil, climate, socio-economic conditions and limited resources, skill and capacity while implementing. Schemes they need should be area-specific and farmer-friendly.
- Every year Union Budget adds a good number of schemes supported by subsidies and institutional credit which farmers find extremely difficult to implement since they cannot easily and timely access subsidies and credit. They need their participation and consultation to design hassle-free and speedy procedure, methods and system to access subsidies and credit for implanting schemes
- Farmers do insist to voice their views on important legislation being drafted or passed by Parliament, viz. Seed Act, Land Bill, Commodity Spot Exchange Regulation Act, Groundwater Extraction Regulation Bill, National Water Policy, Policy on Genetically Modified Crops, Contract Farming, Warehousing Receipt, etc.
- Farmers intend to be fully aware of all recommendations including their rights and obligations contained in the Report on” National Commission for Farmers”.
- Farmers insist their participation and consultation before allocation of funds for agriculture in annual budgets as they feel allocations at the national level are arbitrary and do not reflect the real needs of farmers of different agro-ecological regions, States and districts.
- Tenant and women farmers need immediate legislation establishing their legal rights and relationship with the land they cultivate to help them invest, access credit, insurance, etc.
- Every rupee spent on agricultural research yields a return varying from Rs.1.39 to Rs.3.66 on different food crops. Total Government spending on agricultural research has stagnated over the past decade at a meager 0.6% of the agriculture sector’s GDP and is considerably lower at 0.14% on agricultural extension services to transfer technology to farmers. Farmers insist to progressively raise to a minimum at 2% and 1% respectively by 2017. Besides, agricultural research institutes and centers need to be widely dispersed in all agro-ecological regions and extension service network in all villages of the country.
- As agriculture has been the State subject farmers have serious views that States in general and districts/Blocks, in particular, must be given adequate financial resources on time, hassle-free and full authority and flexibility to frame research policy, formulate development strategies and create infrastructure. In this specific case, farmers at district, Block and village levels want their “voice heard and officials of Central and State Governments held accountably”.
- To facilitate better implementation of programs and projects farmers desire to avail of most supplies and services at Block headquarter or preferably in the village itself. Each Block in the country should become a nodal center and adequately strengthened to provide all services to farmers, viz. [i]training to farmers in all respects of scientific methods of cultivation [theoretical with practical demonstration] [ii] sale of approved quality seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, farm tools, equipment and machinery to farmers by authorized dealers [iii] soil, water, seed. fertilizer, pesticide testing facilities [iv]supply of spares, services and repair facilities of farm machinery [v] storage and warehousing facilities [vi]Agricultural Produce Market Committee [vii]KrishiVigyan Kendra [viii] Branch of financial institutions supported by technologies.
- Each village should have progressively facilities viz. [i] seed production by progressive and trained farmers under the close supervision of technical staff and certified by authorized agency appointed at district level [ii] agricultural extension staff [iii] demonstration of the technology on selected small farmer’s field [iv] formation of Farmers’ clubs and Self-Help-Groups of small, marginal, tenant and women farmers; share croppers and oral lessees[v] Branch of financial institutions to provide all facilities to farmers and rural households [vi] Automatic Weather Record Station to help farmers access weather-based crop insurance scheme [vii] Village Mandi in a relatively bigger village
- a. Since resources, viz. land, water and energy are limited, scarce, costly and having competing demand for urbanization, industrialization and meeting farming needs, there is a greater need now than before to consider appointing an independent Regulatory and Development Authority manned by professional to look these resources in totality and evolve appropriate legal framework, mechanism and procedure to deal with existing and emerging issues.[ii] Farm productivity improvement depends significantly upon the use of inputs, viz. seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, water, farm equipment and machinery, etc. which have necessarily to be of standard quality, available on time and at a reasonable price protecting consumers’ rights. This, therefore, calls for putting in place the Regulatory and Development Authority to consider legal framework, mechanism and procedure to ensure that farmers as users invariably are guaranteed to receive farm inputs of these characteristics.
It is, therefore, necessary to thoroughly evaluate the existing governance for agriculture including the decentralization process in the light of emerging needs and reinvent the governance system and consider Public-Private-Partnership mode to facilitate better planning and implementation of policy,programs and projects.
Conclusion: While governance acknowledges the facts that [i] all farmers [including small, marginal, women and tenant farmers, sharecroppers, oral lessees, landless laborers, farmers of tribal, hilly and drought-prone areas] should have equal opportunity to sustainably develop agriculture for their livelihoods, food and nutritional security and poverty-alleviation and [ii] institutions and processes should serve all stakeholders, good governance should mediate differing interests in order to reach a broad consensus on the best interest of groups on policies and procedures. To accomplish this Herculean task elected representatives, enlightened professionals and innovative farmers should have a broad and long-term perspective on good governance along with a sense of what is needed that can contribute to agricultural growth leading to human development. Besides, there should be a proper understanding of the historical, cultural and socio-economic complexities on which that perspective can be founded.